Bulphan couple in the dock after scrounging nearly £100,000 in benefits

A COUPLE who scrounged almost £100,000 in benefits by pretending they were living on the breadline, actually owned several plush homes in south Essex, a villa in Spain and even a yacht.

Jet-setters Paul Hoyle and Kim Burrell fleeced the public purse of £97,000 in benefits they weren’t entitled to over a six year period.

Although the pair pleaded poverty they owned three homes in Bulphan, Thurrock, properties in Alicante, Spain and Loire Atlandtique in France, a lavish catamaran and drove around in an E type Jag.

Their complex web of deceit which involved Hoyle inventing false identities, fictitious landlords and tenancy agreements, to claim housing and council tax benefit was finally unravelled after the 72- year- old- made a paperwork mistake.

For her part Burrell, 52, claimed she was a single mother struggling to make ends meets when in fact she lived with Hoyle in their £300,000 home in Albert Road, Bulphan.

She also claimed a raft of benefits from 2004 to 2010 to which she wasn’t entitled- hiding the fact she had £16,000 in one bank account alone.

The court heard how Hoyle and Burrell - who had a baby girl together in 2005 - carried out a “sophisticated scam”, with Hoyle contstantly transferring the deeds to their three homes over to alias names such as “James Ward” He also obtained passport and identity cards in alias names to back up the sham.

An investigation by the Department for Work and Pensions and Thurrock Council was launched after Hoyle let his guard down and signed a housing registry document in his own name.

Officials then found a number of bank accounts in the UK and Spain opened by the couple, as well as a paperwork trail of their oversees properties and mooring fees for their yacht.

The pair found themselves in the dock at Basildon Crown Court on Wednesday to be sentenced for their crimes.

Hoyle, who was said to be “in frail health” and has a pacemaker fitted admitted 10 counts of benefit fraud as well as falsifying documents.

His honour Judge John Lodge said: “You have abused our benefits system. It is there to help the most needy of society, not for criminals to abuse it.”

Burrell, who also has two children from a previous relationship, was given an eight month suspended prison sentence after admitting nine offences of benefit fraud.

She was also told to carry out 200 hours of community service.

The mum who sat in the dock weeping, was depicted as a “naive”and “vulnerable “character by her defence team who had endured physical abuse in a past marriage.

However Judge Lodge told her; “I am far from convinced you are as naive as some people make out.

“You played your part in this.”

The couple have been warned they will have to sell their properties to pay back the £97,217 they fleeced.

Comments(11)

Marcus P says...
1:58pm Sat 11 Aug 12

This is theft pure and simple. They should both get long prison terms. I suspect a 'caution' is the worst they will receive.

grays_mum says...
6:37pm Sat 11 Aug 12

Absolutely no excuse for this. So what if her previous relationship had been abusive - why does that make it OK to steal? They both knew they were breaking the law. At least in this case the money can be repaid by selling their homes.

jb411 says...
8:09pm Sat 11 Aug 12

So if I walked into a bank and robbed it of £100k do you think I'd get eight months suspended for two years and 200 hours of unpaid work? No nor do I! Theft of £100k should mean a long prison sentence for both.

fletch12107 says...
8:26am Sun 12 Aug 12

If the property prices in Bulphan were cheaper then they wouldn't have needed to steal so much.

redrobin42 says...
1:30pm Tue 14 Aug 12

Im not saying that what this couple was did was right, but you should be aware that this article is factually wrong on several points and it is not as black and white as it may read. It has been 'hammed up' purely to make it a more interesing read!! You should not believe all that you read in the paper!!

AngryJay says...
2:27pm Tue 14 Aug 12

fletch12107 wrote:
If the property prices in Bulphan were cheaper then they wouldn't have needed to steal so much.
What a stupid comment to make ! House prices in Bulphan are relative to the area along with the properties being desirable. They stole so much due to the fact they are greedy, low-life criminals trying to manipulate the system for their own benefit. I like the fact the judge stated they are naive although mentioning they devised a 'sophisticated scam'... Surely naivity and sophistication do not exactly go hand in hand ! Lock them up !

Thurrockbob says...
5:54am Wed 15 Aug 12

redrobin42 wrote:
Im not saying that what this couple was did was right, but you should be aware that this article is factually wrong on several points and it is not as black and white as it may read. It has been 'hammed up' purely to make it a more interesing read!! You should not believe all that you read in the paper!!
They stole and cheated from the benefit system ..... Fact!
They stole and cheated nearly 100k from the benefit system ....Fact!
They have a large house in Bulphan, 3 more abroad, a yacht, a really nice car and money in the bank ..... Fact!

So your point is ........

WTF100 says...
12:27pm Wed 15 Aug 12

So "they will have to sell their properties to pay back the £97,217 they fleeced." OK and what about any profit made on those properties over the years? Will that be going back to the tax payer? Doubtful, so they've still done alright out of their scam.

redrobin42 says...
6:20pm Wed 15 Aug 12

Thurrockbob.......I'
ll make it clear for you!!
My point is.....that the artical is factually wrong on several points and that you should not believe all that you read in the paper!!! FACT!!!

SaveOurStanford says...
9:48pm Wed 15 Aug 12

redrobin42 wrote:
Thurrockbob.......I' ll make it clear for you!! My point is.....that the artical is factually wrong on several points and that you should not believe all that you read in the paper!!! FACT!!!
Well Obviously a Friend or Realtive are we robin ? Until the Thurrock Gazette Amend this I will Belive Them and £100Grand stolen is not a like Pocket change its a Life changing amount and lets hope when they repay it it will Help the Genuine in Need.

redrobin42 says...
2:13pm Thu 16 Aug 12

Saveourstanford, yes, which is how i know that what's been reported is incorrect, if you read what i said in my initial posting, i wasn't saying what was done was right, i was simply saying that was written was exaggerated and some of some of it untrue. And if you read everything you reading the papers and take it as the truth then you are very naive.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree